PALO ALTO—It looked—for one team—like
an early preseason match.
The Washington Huskies looked tentative. Much of what Stanford did on offense seemed to
surprise them. They looked for all the world as if they were learning a new
system.
Which, of course, they were.
For the second night in a row,
the Huskies looked completely out-of-sync in a loss to a Bay Area opponent.
Unlike the previous night in Berkeley, there were no rotation errors on serve
receive. But there were plenty of out-of-position blockers, ill-timed sets and
easy-to-dig attacks. They played like teammates who were just getting to know
each other.
Let the second-guessing begin. Washington
coach Jim McLaughlin’s decision to suddenly
implement a two-setter offense in the middle of a successful season looks like
the obvious explanation for ugly road losses to Cal and Stanford. Neither
opponent served all that well. Both opponents handed Washington a steady stream
of in-system opportunities. Neither opposing setter was all that imposing.
Yet, the Huskies failed to take
advantage.
If the newly-inserted 6/2 system
was to blame, McLaughlin wasn’t having any second thoughts.
“No, not at all,” he said as his
team headed out of Maples Pavilion. “I really like it. I don’t think it’s a
function of the system, I think it’s just, we gotta have better execution.”
Washington's Kylin Munoz (24) and Krista Vansant (16) scramble to cover a Stanford block [Volleyblog Seattle photo by Leslie Hamann] |
When two top teams meet in any
sport, seemingly little things can make a big difference. And on this night, UW
did almost all the little things wrong.
ATTACKING WITHOUT AUTHORITY
For the match, both teams had
exactly 111 attempts each. Stanford committed 20 hitting errors; Washington
just 17.
But while 46 of the Cardinal’s attacks
went for kills, the Huskies landed just 29. That huge disparity was the symptom
of all that went wrong.
In general, Washington passed
well. But setters Evan Sanders and Jenni Nogueras were erratic, often
putting up balls that were two meters or more off the net.
“They gotta put the ball up a
little better,” said McLaughlin. “But they know that.”
With less-than-ideal sets, UW’s
outside hitters—and especially Krista
Vansant—often ran under the ball, depriving them of power or forcing them
to make the ball sail. Too many of the attacks were easy to dig, allowing
Stanford to win that category by a mile, 59 digs to just 40 for the Huskies.
LACK OF ON-COURT LEADERSHIP
Washington has three seniors: Bianca Rowland, Lauren Barfield and Evan Sanders. In the 6/2 offense, all
three spend half their time rotated out. Of those who do stay on the court
throughout—junior Jenna Orlandini
and freshmen Vansant and Summer Ross—none
stepped up to lift the team when it needed it.
Ross had an impressive weekend,
combining her usual defensive focus with smart offense.
“She’s been pretty stable,”
McLaughlin said after the match. “I was proud of her performance last night and
tonight.”
Vansant had the worst two
matches of her young career, unable to adjust to Cal and Stanford’s quick,
athletic blockers.
“We just gotta work on it,” McLaughlin
said of Vansant. “She’s just gotta hit high and deep. But we’ve gotta give her better
swings.”
Neither freshman, as might be
expected, is a vocal leader. There’s little doubt that will happen, but it isn’t
their role this year.
Orlandini is having a solid
season, but on the elite Pac-12 teams, setters or big-time hitters usually
provide the emotional spark, with liberos supporting that effort. Jo (as her
teammates call her) is a leader, but not THE leader this team needs when the chips
are down.
THE HUSKIES WERE TOO PREDICTABLE
Washington's Jenni Nogueras (9) sets against Stanford [Volleyblog Seattle photo by Leslie Hamann] |
Throughout the weekend, a huge
portion of the Huskies’ attacks came from the left side, often cross-court.
When Vansant and Kylin Muñoz make a
good approach and get a big jump, they can pound with anyone. But Muñoz rarely
hits line, allowing the opposing libero to camp in the corner. And when Vansant
is impatient, she is too easily blocked.
Both Cal and Stanford got decent
production from the right side and from back row attacks. The Huskies are
capable of both, but—perhaps because several players were in unfamiliar
positions in the 6/2—they had limited success hitting from those two positions.
Finally, the UW setters may be
too focused on finding a rhythm with their middle blockers. In McLaughlin’s
system, middles are not expected to carry the offensive load, but when they do
attack, their hitting percentages should be high. Against Stanford, Rowland hit
just .182; Barfield merely .143.
If history is any indication,
Jim McLaughlin probably didn’t get much sleep after the Stanford loss. And he’ll
undoubtedly be in the office again Sunday, perhaps cooking up a new scheme for Oregon and Oregon State.
And around the league, opposing
coaches are likely scratching their heads about McLaughlin’s Bay Area surprise.
If nothing else, he’s given the rest of the league something else to worry
about in the second half of the season. How will we prepare for Washington? And
what happens if the team has enough training time to actually feel comfortable
with the 6/2?
“You don’t play well every night,” said McLaughlin. “We gotta
fix what we need to fix, and get better.”
I was at the CAL and Stanford matches. Your assessment is right on point. I do believe that more practice time the 6-2 will help UW in the tournament. Setters have a different connection with different hitters. This system, with some tuning, will give UW the best setter/hitter combination. You have to use the tools you have, no one is better than Jim McLaughlin in getting the best out of his players.
ReplyDelete